File Detail parts/2723p05.dat

Download Download zip file View patterns/composites/shortcuts

Official File parts/2723p05.dat

Part Attributes: Base Part: 2723.dat

External Sites:

View on Rebrickable View on BrickLink View on BrickOwl

Technic Disc 3 x 3 with Axlehole with 4 Black Sections on One Side and 8 on Reverse Pattern

File Header:

0 Technic Disc  3 x  3 with Axlehole with 4 Black Sections on One Side and 8 on Reverse Pattern
0 Name: 2723p05.dat
0 Author: Rene Rechthaler [Blechtaler]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Part UPDATE 2023-03
0 !LICENSE Licensed under CC BY 4.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !KEYWORDS BrickLink 2723pb002, control, Rebrickable 2723pr0005, Set 1090
0 !KEYWORDS Set 1092, Set 9700

0 !HISTORY 2023-01-01 [MagFors] Reworked pattern subfile
0 !HISTORY 2023-06-24 [OrionP] Official Update 2023-03

Show contents

1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\2723s02.dat
1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\2723p05s01.dat
1 16 0 0 0 0 0 -1 0 1 0 1 0 0 s\2723p05s01.dat
1 16 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 -1 s\2723p05s01.dat
1 16 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 -1 0 0 s\2723p05s01.dat

Status:

Official

Unofficial parents

Part Events:

Archived Part Events:

Rene Rechthaler [Blechtaler]

initially submitted the part.

2022-06-16 14:45:01

Magnus Forsberg [MagFors]

posted a vote of Hold.

2022-06-16 17:35:01

This file need to have s\ in front of every added subfile.
Like this:
1 16 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\2723p05s01.dat

Rene Rechthaler [Blechtaler]

submitted a new version of the part.

2022-06-16 19:45:01

Sorry, newbie error (worked in Stud.io PartDesigner)

Existing certification-votes were deleted.

Rene Rechthaler [Blechtaler]

submitted a new version of the part.

2022-06-16 20:25:01

Forgot 48\4-4aring

Magnus Forsberg [MagFors]

posted a vote of Hold.

2022-06-16 21:35:01

The file is mising a BCF statement.

The word "set" need to be added in front of each setnumber.

And in the subfiles, leading, and trailing, zeros are not allowed. Is it possible to make the pattern using ring primitives?

Why did you make a third subfile, and then not use it?

Rene Rechthaler [Blechtaler]

made the following comment.

2022-06-17 15:10:01

Do I need a BCF Statement when there are no own faces, just linked submodels?

Why no additional zeros? I wrote the submodels by hand, there it was useful to keep the matrix square and table-like...
The third submodel will be used for another, similar part I'm working at.

Orion Pobursky [OrionP]

made the following comment.

2022-06-17 20:05:01

BFC and zero removal are required by the Library Spec:
https://www.ldraw.org/article/512.html#format
https://www.ldraw.org/article/512.html#bfc

Rene Rechthaler [Blechtaler]

submitted a new version of the part.

2022-06-18 15:10:01

with more sets and BFC

Existing certification-votes were deleted.

Max Martin Richter [MMR1988]

made the following comment.

2022-11-22 21:55:01

In my eyes there would be less microgaps, when this part would use unrotated prims instead of the subparts. Maybe it should be done completely without subparts.

Franklin W. Cain [fwcain]

posted a vote of Certify.

2022-11-25 04:40:02

Magnus Forsberg [MagFors]

submitted a new version of the part.

2023-01-01 17:40:01

Reworked using a single pattern file.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.

Max Martin Richter [MMR1988]

made the following comment.

2023-01-01 20:10:02

Magnus you need to add a history line!

[PTadmin]