Unofficial File parts/6285381f.dat
Warning: Model breaking changes to unofficial parts may occur anytime prior to release
0 Sticker 0.8 x 1.8 with Porsche Badge on Transparent Background
0 Name: 6285381f.dat
0 Author: Magnus Forsberg [MagFors]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Licensed under CC BY 4.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 !CATEGORY Sticker
0 !KEYWORDS 911, Bricklink 75895stk01, Brickowl 178456, front, Rebrickable 65827
0 !KEYWORDS set 75895
0 !HISTORY 2024-06-30 [OrionP] Official Update 2024-05
0 !HISTORY 2024-07-24 [Sirio] Made Porsche logo a primitive; updated reference
0 !HISTORY 2026-09-30 [Sirio] Introduced stickerback; changed description; rounded corners; use subpart of 6221655ae for top faceShow file code:
1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\stickerback008x018.dat
0 BFC NOCLIP
1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\6221655aes01.datStatus
Needs 2 More Votes (F)
Current Votes:
No recorded votesThis part has the following automated holds from the Parts Tracker
-
Has Uncertified Subfiles
Part Dependencies
Official parents and subparts
Part Events
Archived Part Events:
Massimo Maso [Sirio]
initially submitted the part.
2024-07-24 15:59:08
Updated to new logo primitive.
Orion Pobursky [OrionP]
posted a vote of Hold
2024-07-24 21:50:34
Logo reference needs to be fixed.
Massimo Maso [Sirio]
submitted a new version of the part (all votes reset).
2024-07-24 23:32:42
Rene Rechthaler [Blechtaler]
posted a vote of Hold
2024-07-25 15:22:55
the logo including rim is BFC noclip, either the only the logo without rim or nothing should be BFC noclip
Massimo Maso [Sirio]
made the following comment.
2024-07-26 16:24:44
I don't quite understand what you mean. Orion asked me to divide the colored part of the badge and the neutral part of the box. Maybe that's enough to solve your problem as well. When it's ready, try to look at it again and let me know.
Orion Pobursky [OrionP]
made the following comment.
2024-07-26 16:37:10
Changing the prim as I mentioned in the comment on the prim will fix this issue.
Magnus Forsberg [MagFors]
made the following comment.
2024-07-26 19:15:43
IMHO, having just the badge within BFC Noclip just because it is printed on a trans material here, doesn't make much sense, since it will be backwards seen from behind.
I say it isn't needed here. Having prints like this to be within BFC Noclip as mandatory, is an unnecessary/bad rule.
I say it isn't needed here. Having prints like this to be within BFC Noclip as mandatory, is an unnecessary/bad rule.
Orion Pobursky [OrionP]
made the following comment.
2024-07-26 22:05:22
Backward is how it would approximately look in real life though (I realize the way printing works that it would probably look like the bottom printed color, but this is a good approximation).
Massimo Maso [Sirio]
submitted a new version of the part (all votes reset).
2024-07-26 22:38:09
Takeshi Takahashi [RainbowDolphin]
posted a vote of Certify
2024-09-20 21:34:08
Rene Rechthaler [Blechtaler]
posted a vote of Certify
2025-05-25 14:39:04
Massimo Maso [Sirio]
submitted a new version of the part (all votes reset).
2026-10-01 18:06:07