Unofficial File parts/6285381f.dat
Part Attributes:
File Header:
0 Sticker 0.8 x 1.7 with Porsche Badge on Transparent Background
0 Name: 6285381f.dat
0 Author: Magnus Forsberg [MagFors]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Licensed under CC BY 4.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 !KEYWORDS 911, Bricklink 75895stk01, Brickowl 178456, front, Rebrickable 65827
0 !KEYWORDS set 75895
0 !HISTORY 2024-06-30 [OrionP] Official Update 2024-05
0 !HISTORY 2024-07-24 [Sirio] Made Porsche logo a primitive; updated reference
Show contents
0 // Primitives
1 16 0 -0.25 0 0.56 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.56 logo-porsche-badge-box.dat
1 16 0 -0.25 0 17.5 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 8.5 box5-12.dat
0 // Faces
4 16 -17.5 -0.25 8.5 -3.8864 -0.25 5.04 3.8864 -0.25 5.04 17.5 -0.25 8.5
4 16 17.5 -0.25 8.5 3.8864 -0.25 5.04 3.8864 -0.25 -5.04 17.5 -0.25 -8.5
4 16 17.5 -0.25 -8.5 3.8864 -0.25 -5.04 -3.8864 -0.25 -5.04 -17.5 -0.25 -8.5
4 16 -17.5 -0.25 -8.5 -3.8864 -0.25 -5.04 -3.8864 -0.25 5.04 -17.5 -0.25 8.5
0 BFC NOCLIP
0 // Primitives
1 16 0 -0.25 0 0.56 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.56 logo-porsche-badge.dat
Status:
Awaiting Admin Review (CCF)
This part has the following automated holds from the Parts Tracker
-
Has uncertified subfiles
Current Votes:
| User | Vote |
|---|---|
| RainbowDolphin | Certify |
| Blechtaler | Certify |
Official parents and subparts
Part Events:
Archived Part Events:
Updated to new logo primitive.
Logo reference needs to be fixed.
2024-07-24 23:32:42
the logo including rim is BFC noclip, either the only the logo without rim or nothing should be BFC noclip
2024-07-26 16:24:44
I don't quite understand what you mean. Orion asked me to divide the colored part of the badge and the neutral part of the box. Maybe that's enough to solve your problem as well. When it's ready, try to look at it again and let me know.
2024-07-26 16:37:10
Changing the prim as I mentioned in the comment on the prim will fix this issue.
2024-07-26 19:15:43
IMHO, having just the badge within BFC Noclip just because it is printed on a trans material here, doesn't make much sense, since it will be backwards seen from behind.
I say it isn't needed here. Having prints like this to be within BFC Noclip as mandatory, is an unnecessary/bad rule.
I say it isn't needed here. Having prints like this to be within BFC Noclip as mandatory, is an unnecessary/bad rule.
2024-07-26 22:05:22
Backward is how it would approximately look in real life though (I realize the way printing works that it would probably look like the bottom printed color, but this is a good approximation).
2024-07-26 22:38:09
2024-09-20 21:34:08
2025-05-25 14:39:04
Creative Commons Attribution License information
This part is copyright ©
Magnus Forsberg
Licensed under
CC BY 4.0
Edits:
LDraw.org Parts Tracker,
Orion Pobursky, Massimo Maso