subparted for patterns, changed box prims again (uploaded before save...)

if the 4long side matches s\61678s01.dat, the 3long side should match s\24309s01.dat

Modified left curve, want to work on front as well, i think it needs to be lowered, there is room for that

small fix

what sets have a patterned version of this?

hm, thats strange: the 3x1 (50950) and 3x2 (24309) have a different amount of top surfaces...
guess that should be synchronized first, and this curvature should be used here then.
I would say 50950.dat should get reworked (there are small triangular stud holders missing) to match the 48\1-8cyli.dat from 24309.dat

Quick intermediate release, used the curve of 24309 as a reference, tweaked the front a bit, but still want to try to get the curve smoother

try moving the 7 19.2 -37 vertex to 7 20 -37
imagine fitting the front to this triangle:
3 16 10 18.6202 -37 -10 20 -20 10 20 -40

for the top, are these better?
4 16 10 1.2836 19.12 10 0 40 -10 0 40 -10 .5872 28.9266
3 16 10 1.2835758 19.12 -10 .5872 28.9266 -10 2.3284 18.0399
3 16 10 1.2835758 19.12 -10 2.3284 18.0399 10 5.0895 -1.408
3 16 10 5.0895 -1.408 -10 2.3284 18.0399 -10 5.1963 7.5265
3 16 10 5.0895 -1.408 -10 5.1963 7.5265 10 11.3582 -21.232
3 16 10 11.3582 -21.232 -10 5.1963 7.5265 -10 9.1499 -2.4268
3 16 10 11.3582 -21.232 -10 9.1499 -2.4268 10 18.6202 -37
3 16 10 18.6202 -37 -10 9.1499 -2.4268 -10 14.1072 -11.6589
3 16 -10 14.1072 -11.6589 -10 20 -20 10 18.6202 -37

5 24 -1.5 20 -20 -6 22 -20 -1.5 24 -20 -1.5 17 -16
should get converted to a normal edge line

the bottom of the front cutout could get done with prims:
1 16 6 22.5858 -35 1 1 0 0 0 1.4142 -1 1 0 1-4cyls2.dat
1 16 6 22.5858 -35 -1 -.5 0 0 0 1.4142 1 -.5 0 1-4cyli.dat
1 16 5.5 22.5858 -35.5 -1 1 0 0 0 1.4142 1 0 0 1-4chrd.dat
1 16 5.5 22.5858 -35.5 -1 1 0 0 0 1.4142 1 0 0 1-4edge.dat
1 16 6 22.5858 -35 0 1 0 0 0 1.4142 2 0 0 1-4edge.dat
1 16 6 22.5858 -35 0 1 0 0 0 1.4142 2 0 0 1-4ndis.dat

updated with suggestions (not including the prims yet)

Raised the center front a bit (0.25 LDU) and took a different angle for the front curve on the top. Still difficult to get it perfect while preserving the curves with adjacent pieces

some changes again to the front, renamed in line with similar parts to curved slope

no chance to use prims for the cutout chamfers?

should be fitted to use this:
3 16 -10 5.1963 7.5265 -10 9.1499 -2.4268 10 11.3582 -21.2293
3 16 10 11.3582 -21.2293 -10 9.1499 -2.4268 10 18.6202 -37
4 16 7 20 -37 10 18.6202 -37 -10 9.1499 -2.4268 -10 14.1072 -11.6589
3 16 -10 14.1072 -11.6589 -10 20 -20 7 20 -37
as of now there are some bad condlines
this is also strange:
3 16 1.5 16 -16 -6 12 -4 6 12 -4
3 16 1.5 16 -16 -1.5 17 -16 -6 12 -4
3 16 6 16 -20 1.5 16 -16 6 12 -4
i guess the 6 18 -20 should be something like 6 17 -20
some vertices have way too much decimals, especially at the stud cutout
(prims? simpler chamfer? p16->p8? using p16 prims for intersections?)

Changed surface

that one internal cavity looks strange, should be something like that:
3 16 1.5 15.75 -16 -1.5 17.25 -16 -6 12 -4
3 16 6 16 -20 1.5 18.25 -20 1.5 15.75 -16
4 16 -6 12 -4 -1.5 17.25 -16 -1.5 19.75 -20 -6 22 -20
3 16 6 16 -20 -6 12 -4 6 12 -4
3 16 1.5 15.75 -16 -6 12 -4 6 16 -20
2 24 1.5 18.25 -20 1.5 15.75 -16
2 24 6 16 -20 1.5 18.25 -20
2 24 -1.5 17.25 -16 -1.5 19.75 -20
2 24 1.5 15.75 -16 -1.5 17.25 -16
2 24 -6 22 -20 -1.5 19.75 -20
5 24 6 16 -20 -6 12 -4 6 12 -4 1.5 18.25 -20
and as already said: the cutout should be parallel, as of now a stud collides
1 16 0 24 -30 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 stud.dat (very small collision)
try cutting it out from prims (via isecalc)
1 16 6.0811 22 -36.0811 -1.4142 3.5355 0 0 0 2 1.4142 3.5355 0 1-4cyli.dat
1 16 3.2527 21.4142 -33.2527 1.4142 3.5355 0 0 0 -2 -1.4142 3.5355 0 1-4cyli.dat
1 16 -6.0811 22 -23.9189 1.4142 3.5355 0 0 0 2 -1.4142 3.5355 0 1-4cyli.dat
1 16 -3.2527 21.4142 -26.7473 -1.4142 3.5355 0 0 0 -2 1.4142 3.5355 0 1-4cyli.dat
(that one is just a suggestion, that are R2 cylis rotated 45° around the stud)