Unofficial File parts/30526.dat
Part Attributes:
File Header:
0 Brick 1 x 2 with 2 Pins
0 Name: 30526.dat
0 Author: Magnus Forsberg [MagFors]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Licensed under CC BY 4.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 !HISTORY 2002-04-25 [PTadmin] Official Update 2002-02
0 !HISTORY 2007-06-10 [PTadmin] Header formatted for Contributor Agreement
0 !HISTORY 2008-07-01 [PTadmin] Official Update 2008-01
0 !HISTORY 2010-01-19 [Eldar] Add BFC
0 !HISTORY 2010-07-05 [PTadmin] Official Update 2010-02
0 !HISTORY 2025-03-25 [MagFors] Complete rewrite, original by Joseph H. Cardana
Show contents
1 16 0 4 0 -1 0 0 0 -5 0 0 0 -1 stud3.dat
0 BFC INVERTNEXT
1 16 0 24 0 -16 0 0 0 -20 0 0 0 -6 box5.dat
4 16 -20 24 -10 -16 24 -6 16 24 -6 20 24 -10
4 16 20 24 -10 16 24 -6 16 24 6 20 24 10
4 16 20 24 10 16 24 6 -16 24 6 -20 24 10
4 16 -20 24 10 -16 24 6 -16 24 -6 -20 24 -10
1 16 0 24 0 20 0 0 0 -24 0 0 0 10 box4t.dat
1 16 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 -1 stug-1x2.dat
4 16 -20 0 -10 -20 24 -10 20 24 -10 20 0 -10
1 16 -10 10 -10 8 0 0 0 0 8 0 1 0 4-4edge.dat
1 16 -10 10 -10 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 4-4edge.dat
1 16 -10 10 -10 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 connect.dat
1 16 10 10 -10 8 0 0 0 0 8 0 1 0 4-4edge.dat
1 16 10 10 -10 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 4-4edge.dat
1 16 10 10 -10 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 connect.dat
Status:
Needs 2 More Votes (F)
Current Votes:
None
Official parents and subparts
Part Events:
Archived Part Events:
2025-04-22 19:30:05
What was the purpose of the rewrite? Why was it done?
2025-04-22 19:46:01
license/author change maybe
but idk why the rework had to redo the complete brick...
could use s\3004s01.dat
should the pins get cut out from the surface (via ndis)?
but idk why the rework had to redo the complete brick...
could use s\3004s01.dat
should the pins get cut out from the surface (via ndis)?
2025-04-22 19:48:00
Inlining the 3004 parts (which is a bit more "clean") I guess.
Just looked at a real one and I am confused - the Technic pins have clearly visible friction ridges, but act like friction-less ones. Should this get the friction ridges in the model?
Also since you are using a box with missing front, should there be 2 ndis at the front as well to avoid the T-junc?
Just looked at a real one and I am confused - the Technic pins have clearly visible friction ridges, but act like friction-less ones. Should this get the friction ridges in the model?
Also since you are using a box with missing front, should there be 2 ndis at the front as well to avoid the T-junc?
Creative Commons Attribution License information
This part is copyright © Magnus Forsberg
Licensed under CC BY 4.0
Edits:
LDraw.org Parts Tracker,
El'dar Ismagilov,