Official File parts/33160.dat
Part Attributes:
File Header:
0 Hoop Shaped Bar 7 x 7
0 Name: 33160.dat
0 Author: Chris Böhnke [KnightOfTarenta]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Part UPDATE 2025-07
0 !LICENSE Licensed under CC BY 4.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 !CATEGORY Belville
0 !KEYWORDS circle, Circus, Loop, Ring
0 !HISTORY 2025-07-27 [OrionP] Official Update 2025-07
Show contents
1 16 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 -60 0 60 0 0 48\tm08q0667.dat
1 16 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 -60 0 0 0 60 48\tm08q0667.dat
1 16 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 -60 0 0 0 -60 48\tm08q0667.dat
1 16 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 -60 0 -60 0 0 48\tm08q0667.dat
1 16 0 0 0 0 0 -60 0 -60 0 60 0 0 48\tm08q0667.dat
1 16 0 0 0 -60 0 0 0 -60 0 0 0 60 48\tm08q0667.dat
1 16 0 0 0 -60 0 0 0 -60 0 0 0 -60 48\tm08q0667.dat
1 16 0 0 0 0 0 -60 0 -60 0 -60 0 0 48\tm08q0667.dat
Status:
Official
Unofficial parents
Part Events:
Archived Part Events:
2025-07-02 12:04:10
2025-07-02 16:17:50
the BL and RB pics on the baseplates look more like a D6 Studs ->R60
"And don't make it as an quarter." -> eighth or full?
"And don't make it as an quarter." -> eighth or full?
2025-07-02 16:35:28
You should always make the primitive as re-usable as possible.
I would make two files, one inner and one outer, eighth.
I would make two files, one inner and one outer, eighth.
2025-07-02 20:31:29
2025-07-02 20:32:38
*replaced torus prims with mixed mode 1/8 outer/inner
*seems Rene was right, changed Major Radius to 6 studs, named changed accordingly
*seems Rene was right, changed Major Radius to 6 studs, named changed accordingly
much better (but why is the preview still normal res?)
2025-07-02 20:35:58
I guess the sprue mark on one side isn't worth modelling?
2025-07-02 20:39:51
Thank you for making new prims, but did you check the prim ref to see if there was something you could have used?
Like tm08q0667.dat ?
Like tm08q0667.dat ?
2025-07-02 20:48:17
Hmm, it should match given the dimensions are identical. Should it use that instead?
I am slightly confused - the existent prim is used only once, in a part that looks very similar to this. But it's named as 7x7 not 6x6. Does it not have a regular bar size as minor radius?
I am slightly confused - the existent prim is used only once, in a part that looks very similar to this. But it's named as 7x7 not 6x6. Does it not have a regular bar size as minor radius?
2025-07-02 20:50:09
TLG name is "3.2 SHAFT, DIA. 7M W/ CROSS HOLE", so how can this match?
2025-07-02 20:58:21
In 76289-f1.dat the mixed prim is used at half scale as the inside of the tube.
2025-07-02 21:01:28
(but why is the preview still normal res?)
Because the prims are wrong. They should be made as hi-res, 48-sided.
Because the prims are wrong. They should be made as hi-res, 48-sided.
2025-07-02 21:13:22
I don't have the part, but I find the dimension correct now.
7M is 7 modules = 7 studs. Attach a tile clip at 0 and 180deg, and count the studs. 7
7M is 7 modules = 7 studs. Attach a tile clip at 0 and 180deg, and count the studs. 7
2025-07-02 21:21:32
Ok I get it now - both 79851 and 33160 are the same diameter at 60 LDU for the torus' major radius.
(https://www.newelementary.com/2021/08/lego-harry-potter-76391-hogwarts-icons-parts.html)
*Does this affect naming? 79851 is 7 x 7, this currently not.
*Shall I use the existing prims (full tube) instead of the new outer/inner ones?
(https://www.newelementary.com/2021/08/lego-harry-potter-76391-hogwarts-icons-parts.html)
*Does this affect naming? 79851 is 7 x 7, this currently not.
*Shall I use the existing prims (full tube) instead of the new outer/inner ones?
2025-07-02 21:47:16
2025-07-02 21:48:21
Preview issue seems solved
*Shall it keep the new prims?
*Rename to 7 x 7?
*Shall it keep the new prims?
*Rename to 7 x 7?
2025-07-02 21:54:28
If there is a suitable official prim, it should be used.
Rename to 7 x 7
Rename to 7 x 7
2025-07-02 21:58:46
the tube itself has a center radius of 3 Studs, but the whole part has a outer diameter of 6.4 Studs -> 7x7 seems ok
and yes, should use the 1-8 mixed tube (what about the new prims? delete or keep?)
and yes, should use the 1-8 mixed tube (what about the new prims? delete or keep?)
*Changed to existing prims
*Name changed from 6x6 (ring radius) to 7x7 (effective stud usage)
*Name changed from 6x6 (ring radius) to 7x7 (effective stud usage)
2025-07-02 22:01:22
I guess they should be deleted (marked with hold for now).
2025-07-02 22:05:32
2025-07-03 16:55:07
2025-07-17 21:51:50
2025-07-27 01:51:20
Release 2025-07
Creative Commons Attribution License information
This part is copyright © Chris Böhnke
Licensed under CC BY 4.0
Edits:
LDraw.org Parts Tracker,
Orion Pobursky,
3D View
Website copyright ©2003-2025 LDraw.org, see Legal Info for details.
LDraw is a completely unofficial, community run free CAD system which represents official parts produced by the LEGO company.
LDraw™ is a trademark owned and licensed by the Estate of James Jessiman
LEGO® is a registered trademark of the LEGO Group, which does not sponsor,
endorse, or authorize this site. Visit the official Lego website at
http://www.lego.com
And don't make it as an quarter.