6337 - Fast Track Finish - stickers from sheet 170877 (track map and podium 1,2,3)

Applied naming scheme to leave space for one digit dimensions

track map sticker reworked:
- inlined subpart
- rotated
- stickerback
- flattenend geometry instead of layering
- as subpart became obsolete, moved 170877s06.dat to 170877s05.dat

Similarities and differences of the stickers and prints:
6337 - sticker 1.1 x 1.7, white background, cup shape 1, laurels with gap
6539 - sticker 1.1 x 1.9, transparent background, cup shape 1, laurels with gap
6327 - print on 2x2 brick, cup shape 2, laurels without gap

So 6337 and 6539 can share the pattern (same subfiles) and 6539 adds the geometry to enlarge the background with two quads.
6327 (used in three other sets as well) print looks very similar but is a different cup shape and laurels are cut off slightly differently by cup and have no gap behind cup

Sticker dimensions are roughly guessed, as the reference images are not very detailed and some are at an angle. So the background shape may need to be adjusted. Pattern should be fine.

I already got all three variants prepared with remodelled cups and laurels.

What about subfiles naming? Can a 821435i reference a 170877c subfile? Or have the be named differently?

Merged subfiles, removed category and keywords from subfiles. Changed from mirroring symmetric to inlining geometry fully.

This subfile 170877bs01 can be shared with 821435i. How would the subfile be named so it can be shared between two different parts?

The content of this 821435i would then be like at the end of this message. If you are okay, I would upload it (without the added quads). I am hestitant because this might replace Takeshi's work.
I am unsure if they are the same size or not. The reference photos are not very detailed, so the sides of the stickers are not clearly visible and replica sticker sheets may be off slightly as well. Could be the same or a small width difference. Tendency is same width, so also 1.7

1 16 0 -.25 0 19 0 0 0 .25 0 0 0 10.5 box5-12.dat
1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\170877bs01.dat
1 14 -.7 -.26 2.3 9.2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 9.2 type-swiss721bt-bold-n1.dat
0 // optional quads for width difference 1.7 to 1.9
3 16 17 -.25 -10.5 19 -.25 10.5 17 -.25 10.5
3 16 17 -.25 -10.5 19 -.25 -10.5 19 -.25 10.5
3 16 -17 -.25 -10.5 -17 -.25 10.5 -19 -.25 10.5
3 16 -17 -.25 -10.5 -19 -.25 10.5 -19 -.25 -10.5

Inlined number

Symmetric in subfile, asymmetric in main file

Should the symmetric be kept halved and mirrored or not? Halved results in T-Junction and overlap reports.

Noclip not necessary. Don't understand why it was occuring.

The only thing different from 821435i is that this has a white top surface. Right? The size is the same.
Then, you should use the subfiles from that sticker, but colour the background white.
If you think your pattern is better than Takeshi's, give him a review, on his subfiles.
The structure in his subfiles is the prefered one, the subfiles are reusable.

Like this:
1 16 0 -0.25 0 17 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 11 box5-12.dat
1 15 0 -.25 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\821435is02.dat
1 16 0 -.25 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\821435is01.dat

I put the effort in to trace the shape more accurately. I also appreciate that Takeshi already did it. His number 2 and 3 are very good and I'd like to reuse these for the white stickers 170877c and d. Then the podium topic is done from my side.

Judging by the initial upload dates it may be that Takeshi should use your subfiles, now that they have a correct subfile structure.
Maybe you two could agree on which files to use? We can't have both.

To answer the question of differences to 821435: yes the only difference is white vs transparent. With slighly uncertainty if there is a width difference which is hard to tell from the blurry reference photos available.

Before messing with the tracker too much, here is a complete draft of the podium stickers and print bricks:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1BJ4ZVtbVObF5Fd9OnAL1AmRzzCt2GNXy/view?usp=sharing

- for model 6327 et al - Brick 2x2 print "1"
- for model 6327 et al - Brick 2x6 print "2 and 3" (modified 2x6 base brick analogous to 2x2 with open front face) - !!!
- for model 6337, 6539 et al - (my "1" subfiles and Takeshi's "2" and "3" subfiles slightly reordered)

I'll leave it up to you to give me an okay before uploading the 2x6, as its a base brick and I don't really like to mess with such a common part! Maybe I overlooked something or its not up to the way the base parts should be modelled, even though I derived from the 2x2. Or maybe some of you with more experience like to takeover that base brick change / addition.

Back to mirroring symmetric part, non mirrorable geometry moved to 170877bs03

* No need for a s03. Add the non-symmetrical geometry right here.

s03 will be used in the transparent variant.

Background also mirrored