Unofficial File parts/3070bpz3.dat
Part Attributes:
Base Part: 3070b.dat
File Header:
0 Tile 1 x 1 with White Star / Sparkle Pattern
0 Name: 3070bpz3.dat
0 Author: Peter Grass [Evilspyre]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Licensed under CC BY 4.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 !KEYWORDS BrickLink 3070pb388, Brickowl 606613, Brickset 114909, Paris
0 !KEYWORDS Rebrickable 3070bpr9884, Set 21064, Star
Show contents
1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\3070bs01.dat
1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\3070bpz3s01.dat
1 16 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\3070bpz3s01.dat
1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 -1 s\3070bpz3s01.dat
1 16 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 -1 s\3070bpz3s01.dat
Status:
Needs 1 More Vote (CN)
This part has the following automated holds from the Parts Tracker
-
Has uncertified subfiles
Current Votes:
| User | Vote |
|---|---|
| Philo | Certify |
Official parents and subparts
Part Events:
2026-01-13 05:14:06
2026-01-13 06:44:43
Header Edits
description:
Tile 1 x 1 with White Star / Sparkle Pattern
to
Tile 1 x 1 with White Star / Sparkle Pattern
2026-01-13 11:07:19
whats the difference to 3070bpx0.dat? https://library.ldraw.org/parts/31245
slightly larger star? rounded ends? different color?
rearding the part (optional): could be cut down to 1/8 and/or use prims (chrd+ndis)
slightly larger star? rounded ends? different color?
rearding the part (optional): could be cut down to 1/8 and/or use prims (chrd+ndis)
2026-01-13 22:05:00
Why do even BL see them as different patterns?
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=3070pb388
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=3070pb344
I think they are two different pattern. One pointy and one rounded.
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=3070pb388
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=3070pb344
I think they are two different pattern. One pointy and one rounded.
2026-01-14 00:37:35
Yeah if you look at the original textures they are different:
https://i.postimg.cc/FKPxjXp4/Screenshot-2026-01-14-003404.png
As for making it an 8th for the complexity and size of the part I don't think its worth it.
https://i.postimg.cc/FKPxjXp4/Screenshot-2026-01-14-003404.png
As for making it an 8th for the complexity and size of the part I don't think its worth it.
I agree they are slightly different.
Making a 1-8 subpart is overkill indeed (1/4 subparting was already somewhat...) but it would solve the different design of horizontal and vertical arms of the star. It doesn't matter since it looks good anyway!
Making a 1-8 subpart is overkill indeed (1/4 subparting was already somewhat...) but it would solve the different design of horizontal and vertical arms of the star. It doesn't matter since it looks good anyway!
Creative Commons Attribution License information
This part is copyright © Peter Grass
Licensed under CC BY 4.0
Edits:
LDraw.org Parts Tracker,
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=3070pb388&C=63#T=C&C=63