re-uploading file with new part number as previous number 3068bpfz.dat was taken by an official part

really with print to the border? or just like the other parts from that age?

*I think the print should get the usual border offset. Note that tiles have slightly visible fillets around the top edges, with prevent full surface print (not sure about the groove-less ones, but this exists with groove only anyways)
*How did the old nummber get taken? What happened there?
*The helpline is confusing. Is there any evidence of this?

Also this print is likely not 22 Purple (Lego's 104 "Bright Violet"):
https://www.flickr.com/photos/126975831@N07/54692618360/in/dateposted/

This pattern used to be here as 3068bpfz, but it has been judged as a misprint and 3068bpf0 should be the proper pattern in previous discussion.
The number 3068bpfz is recycled for a Friends printed tile.

Ok, so the story went like this?
*2020 - Both colour versions of this print were uploaded
*3068bpf0.dat - Red Flowers
*3068bpfz.dat - Purple/Violet Flowers
*The Purple/Violet one gets erroneously considered a "mis-print"
*part 3068bpfz.dat gets deleted before files are certified
*3068bpf0.dat gets released in Update 2020-01
*3068bpfz.dat is available again (never official, so no need to obsolete)
*2025 - 3068bpfz.dat gets re-used for the Friends Strawberry jar, which is now official
*2026 - Purple/Violet Flowers newly uploaded as this file

Meaning everything is fine.

I'm still thinking the sub-files should be reworked for a border around the print (which also means the "LtGreen" in the description can be changed - abreviation and wrong colour name)

And besides all of that:

Having done some research regarding the topic of release of this print (it also appeared in a third set btw), I'm now a bit sceptical that this is truly NOT a misprint.