Unofficial File parts/8491p02.dat
Warning: Model breaking changes to unofficial parts may occur anytime prior to release
0 Tile 1.5 x 1.5 Round with Dark Turquoise Triangle Pattern
0 Name: 8491p02.dat
0 Author: Peter Grass [Evilspyre]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Licensed under CC BY 4.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 !CATEGORY Tile
0 !KEYWORDS Bricklink 8491pb003, Brickowl 373013, Brickset 119093
0 !KEYWORDS Controller button, Playstation, PS1, PSX, Rebrickable 8491pr0002
0 !KEYWORDS Set 72306Show file code:
1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\8491s01.dat
1 16 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 14 4-4ering.dat
4 16 5.3578 0 12.9346 0 0 14 -5.3578 0 12.9346 0 0 12
4 16 -5.3578 0 12.9346 -9.8994 0 9.8994 -12.9346 0 5.3578 0 0 12
4 16 0 0 12 -12.9346 0 5.3578 -14 0 0 -10.39 0 -6
4 16 -14 0 0 -12.9346 0 -5.3578 -9.8994 0 -9.8994 -10.39 0 -6
4 16 5.3578 0 12.9346 0 0 12 12.9346 0 5.3578 9.8994 0 9.8994
4 16 12.9346 0 5.3578 0 0 12 12.9346 0 -5.3578 14 0 0
4 16 -9.8994 0 -9.8994 -5.3578 0 -12.9346 0 0 -14 -10.39 0 -6
4 16 5.3578 0 -12.9346 10.39 0 -6 -10.39 0 -6 0 0 -14
4 16 5.3578 0 -12.9346 9.8994 0 -9.8994 12.9346 0 -5.3578 10.39 0 -6
3 16 -6.66 0 -3.85 6.67 0 -3.84 -.01 0 7.69
3 16 10.39 0 -6 12.9346 0 -5.3578 0 0 12
4 3 10.39 0 -6 6.67 0 -3.84 -6.66 0 -3.85 -10.39 0 -6
4 3 0 0 12 -10.39 0 -6 -6.66 0 -3.85 -.01 0 7.69
4 3 -.01 0 7.69 6.67 0 -3.84 10.39 0 -6 0 0 12Status
Awaiting Admin Review (CCN)
Current Votes:
Philippe Hurbain [Philo]
Chris Böhnke [KnightOfTarenta]
Part Dependencies
Official parents and subparts
Part Events
Peter Grass [Evilspyre]
initially submitted the part.
2026-11-12 00:26:38
Peter Grass [Evilspyre]
submitted a new version of the part (all votes reset).
2026-11-12 00:33:44
Forgot to add the E-ring.
Chris Böhnke [KnightOfTarenta]
made the following comment.
2026-11-12 02:32:05
Why is this not symmetrical?
Theoretical this should be a perfect equilateral triangle. If we use the diameter and line weight of 8491p01, we would get something like this:
4 3 10.392 0 -6 5.196 0 -3 -5.196 0 -3 -10.392 0 -6
4 3 0 0 12 -10.392 0 -6 -5.196 0 -3 0 0 6
4 3 0 0 6 5.196 0 -3 10.392 0 -6 0 0 12
Theoretical this should be a perfect equilateral triangle. If we use the diameter and line weight of 8491p01, we would get something like this:
4 3 10.392 0 -6 5.196 0 -3 -5.196 0 -3 -10.392 0 -6
4 3 0 0 12 -10.392 0 -6 -5.196 0 -3 0 0 6
4 3 0 0 6 5.196 0 -3 10.392 0 -6 0 0 12
Peter Grass [Evilspyre]
made the following comment.
2026-11-12 02:33:47
Indeed, I will make the correction.
Peter Grass [Evilspyre]
submitted a new version of the part (all votes reset).
2026-11-12 03:04:20
Philippe Hurbain [Philo]
made the following comment.
2026-11-13 07:58:43
Nitpicking, but the internal triangle is not symmetrical either...
This should be fine:
4 16 5.36 0 12.94 0 0 14 -5.36 0 12.94 0 0 12
4 16 -5.36 0 12.94 -9.8994 0 9.8994 -12.94 0 5.36 0 0 12
4 16 0 0 12 -12.94 0 5.36 -14 0 0 -10.39 0 -6
4 16 -14 0 0 -12.94 0 -5.36 -9.8994 0 -9.8994 -10.39 0 -6
4 16 5.36 0 12.94 0 0 12 12.94 0 5.36 9.8994 0 9.8994
4 16 12.94 0 5.36 0 0 12 12.94 0 -5.36 14 0 0
4 16 -9.8994 0 -9.8994 -5.36 0 -12.94 0 0 -14 -10.39 0 -6
4 16 5.36 0 -12.94 10.39 0 -6 -10.39 0 -6 0 0 -14
4 16 5.36 0 -12.94 9.8994 0 -9.8994 12.94 0 -5.36 10.39 0 -6
3 16 -6.66 0 -3.85 6.67 0 -3.84 -.01 0 7.69
3 16 10.39 0 -6 12.94 0 -5.36 0 0 12
4 3 10.39 0 -6 6.67 0 -3.84 -6.66 0 -3.85 -10.39 0 -6
4 3 0 0 12 -10.39 0 -6 -6.66 0 -3.85 -.01 0 7.69
4 3 -.01 0 7.69 6.67 0 -3.84 10.39 0 -6 0 0 12
(I made the job while checking, so let's share it :D )
This should be fine:
4 16 5.36 0 12.94 0 0 14 -5.36 0 12.94 0 0 12
4 16 -5.36 0 12.94 -9.8994 0 9.8994 -12.94 0 5.36 0 0 12
4 16 0 0 12 -12.94 0 5.36 -14 0 0 -10.39 0 -6
4 16 -14 0 0 -12.94 0 -5.36 -9.8994 0 -9.8994 -10.39 0 -6
4 16 5.36 0 12.94 0 0 12 12.94 0 5.36 9.8994 0 9.8994
4 16 12.94 0 5.36 0 0 12 12.94 0 -5.36 14 0 0
4 16 -9.8994 0 -9.8994 -5.36 0 -12.94 0 0 -14 -10.39 0 -6
4 16 5.36 0 -12.94 10.39 0 -6 -10.39 0 -6 0 0 -14
4 16 5.36 0 -12.94 9.8994 0 -9.8994 12.94 0 -5.36 10.39 0 -6
3 16 -6.66 0 -3.85 6.67 0 -3.84 -.01 0 7.69
3 16 10.39 0 -6 12.94 0 -5.36 0 0 12
4 3 10.39 0 -6 6.67 0 -3.84 -6.66 0 -3.85 -10.39 0 -6
4 3 0 0 12 -10.39 0 -6 -6.66 0 -3.85 -.01 0 7.69
4 3 -.01 0 7.69 6.67 0 -3.84 10.39 0 -6 0 0 12
(I made the job while checking, so let's share it :D )
Peter Grass [Evilspyre]
submitted a new version of the part (all votes reset).
2026-11-13 10:10:43
OK thanks I made the suggested changes
Philippe Hurbain [Philo]
posted a vote of Hold
2026-11-13 12:45:41
I'm deeply sorry, my values were accidentally rounded too much (causing mismatches on the outer edge), should have been
4 16 5.3578 0 12.9346 0 0 14 -5.3578 0 12.9346 0 0 12
4 16 -5.3578 0 12.9346 -9.8994 0 9.8994 -12.9346 0 5.3578 0 0 12
4 16 0 0 12 -12.9346 0 5.3578 -14 0 0 -10.39 0 -6
4 16 -14 0 0 -12.9346 0 -5.3578 -9.8994 0 -9.8994 -10.39 0 -6
4 16 5.3578 0 12.9346 0 0 12 12.9346 0 5.3578 9.8994 0 9.8994
4 16 12.9346 0 5.3578 0 0 12 12.9346 0 -5.3578 14 0 0
4 16 -9.8994 0 -9.8994 -5.3578 0 -12.9346 0 0 -14 -10.39 0 -6
4 16 5.3578 0 -12.9346 10.39 0 -6 -10.39 0 -6 0 0 -14
4 16 5.3578 0 -12.9346 9.8994 0 -9.8994 12.9346 0 -5.3578 10.39 0 -6
3 16 -6.66 0 -3.85 6.67 0 -3.84 -.01 0 7.69
3 16 10.39 0 -6 12.9346 0 -5.3578 0 0 12
4 3 10.39 0 -6 6.67 0 -3.84 -6.66 0 -3.85 -10.39 0 -6
4 3 0 0 12 -10.39 0 -6 -6.66 0 -3.85 -.01 0 7.69
4 3 -.01 0 7.69 6.67 0 -3.84 10.39 0 -6 0 0 12
Sorry again.
4 16 5.3578 0 12.9346 0 0 14 -5.3578 0 12.9346 0 0 12
4 16 -5.3578 0 12.9346 -9.8994 0 9.8994 -12.9346 0 5.3578 0 0 12
4 16 0 0 12 -12.9346 0 5.3578 -14 0 0 -10.39 0 -6
4 16 -14 0 0 -12.9346 0 -5.3578 -9.8994 0 -9.8994 -10.39 0 -6
4 16 5.3578 0 12.9346 0 0 12 12.9346 0 5.3578 9.8994 0 9.8994
4 16 12.9346 0 5.3578 0 0 12 12.9346 0 -5.3578 14 0 0
4 16 -9.8994 0 -9.8994 -5.3578 0 -12.9346 0 0 -14 -10.39 0 -6
4 16 5.3578 0 -12.9346 10.39 0 -6 -10.39 0 -6 0 0 -14
4 16 5.3578 0 -12.9346 9.8994 0 -9.8994 12.9346 0 -5.3578 10.39 0 -6
3 16 -6.66 0 -3.85 6.67 0 -3.84 -.01 0 7.69
3 16 10.39 0 -6 12.9346 0 -5.3578 0 0 12
4 3 10.39 0 -6 6.67 0 -3.84 -6.66 0 -3.85 -10.39 0 -6
4 3 0 0 12 -10.39 0 -6 -6.66 0 -3.85 -.01 0 7.69
4 3 -.01 0 7.69 6.67 0 -3.84 10.39 0 -6 0 0 12
Sorry again.
Peter Grass [Evilspyre]
submitted a new version of the part (all votes reset).
2026-11-13 13:11:05
No worries, made the changes.
Philippe Hurbain [Philo]
posted a vote of Certify
2026-11-13 14:49:58
Thanks!
Chris Böhnke [KnightOfTarenta]
posted a vote of Certify
2026-11-13 17:01:48