File Detail parts/u8001a.dat

Unofficial File parts/u8001a.dat

Part Attributes:

File Header:

0 Mursten Brick  1 x  2
0 Name: u8001a.dat
0 Author: J.C. Tchang [tchang]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Licensed under CC BY 4.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !CATEGORY Brick
0 !KEYWORDS Automatic Binding Brick, Lego Mursten

0 !HISTORY 2012-08-09 [PTadmin] Official Update 2012-02
0 !HISTORY 2021-07-27 [MagFors] Studs without logo

Show contents

0 BFC INVERTNEXT
1 16 0 24 0 16 0 0 0 -20 0 0 0 6 box5.dat
4 16 20 24 10 16 24 6 -16 24 6 -20 24 10
4 16 -20 24 10 -16 24 6 -16 24 -6 -20 24 -10
4 16 -20 24 -10 -16 24 -6 16 24 -6 20 24 -10
4 16 20 24 -10 16 24 -6 16 24 6 20 24 10
1 16 0 24 0 20 0 0 0 -24 0 0 0 10 box5.dat
1 16 10 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 stud26.dat
1 16 -10 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 stud26.dat

Status:

Needs More Votes (F)

Current Votes:

None

Official parents and subparts

Part Events:

Archived Part Events:

None

Magnus Forsberg [MagFors]

initially submitted the part.

2021-07-31 20:20:03

N. W. Perry [Plastikean]

made the following comment.

2023-11-27 17:59:28

I think this part maybe never existed in real life. All non-stud logo 1x2 bricks of the slotted era had either 1 or 2 slots. The first non-slotted 1x2 bricks had stud logos (and there were also slotted bricks with logos at the same time). In other words, it should still be correct to use 3065.dat even for early 1x2 bricks without slots.

Magnus Forsberg [MagFors]

made the following comment.

2023-11-28 16:15:56

So what do you want to do?
Should this file be made obsolete, and/or is it an alias of 3065?

N. W. Perry [Plastikean]

made the following comment.

2023-11-29 01:55:18

On further research, I think this is true of all the Mursten-era bricks: the elimination of slots seems to coincide with the introduction of logos on studs, so there will always be at least one slot on a non-stud logo part (with some random exceptions like Swedish PRIMA bricks…)
At the same time this means there is a need for hollow bottom bricks with stud logos, so perhaps we should keep the -a variants with the logos, and change only the ones with slots (b,c,d,e…).
In that case I think it makes sense to keep this one as an alias of 3065.

N. W. Perry [Plastikean]

made the following comment.

2023-11-29 03:23:46

Since this question affects a number of parts, discussion opened here: https://forums.ldraw.org/thread-27849.html

Creative Commons Attribution License information