Unofficial File p/stud-high-contrast.dat
Warning: Model breaking changes to unofficial parts may occur anytime prior to release
Stud High Contrast for Instructions
0 Stud High Contrast for Instructions
0 Name: stud-high-contrast.dat
0 Author: Steffen [Steffen]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Primitive
0 !LICENSE Licensed under CC BY 4.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 !HELP This file is a modified version of stud.dat with all vertical surfaces
0 !HELP colored black hardcodedly. This variant can be used as a substitute for
0 !HELP stud.dat by instruction-generating software when a high visual
0 !HELP contrast at studs is desired.

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
Show file code:
1 16 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 4-4edge.dat
1 16 0 -4 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 4-4edge.dat
1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 6 4-4cyli.dat
1 16 0 -4 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 4-4disc.dat

Status

Not releaseable Needs 2 More Votes (N) Needs 2 More Votes (N)

Current Votes:

No recorded votes
This part has the following automated holds from the Parts Tracker
  • No path of certified files to a certified or official parent in the parts folder

Part Dependencies

Official parents and subparts

Part Events

Steffen [Steffen]
Senior Part Reviewer
initially submitted the part.
2018-12-28 05:00:01
this file is another variant of stud.dat
(similar to stud-logo.dat, stud-logo2.dat, stud-logo3.dat, stud-logo4.dat, stud-logo5.dat) which can be used by
instruction-generating software as a substitute for stud.dat
when increased visual contrast at studs is desired.

this variant has all vertical surfaces colored black hardcodedly.
Steffen [Steffen]
Senior Part Reviewer
made the following comment.
2018-12-28 05:20:01
note that the PT has an error here and shows a wrong image:
the image shown is all-black.
however, in the file, only the vertical surfaces are.
the top surface is color 16.
Chris Dee [cwdee]
Part Library Admin
made the following comment.
2018-12-29 08:14:25
Rendering bug fixed.
Massimo Maso [Sirio]
Part Header Editor
made the following comment.
2025-02-04 17:40:42
The file itself is correct. But maybe it's an obsolete project?