Unofficial File parts/5414.dat
Part Attributes:
File Header:
0 Slope Brick Curved 4 x 1 with Cutout Right
0 Name: 5414.dat
0 Author: Evert-Jan Boer [ejboer]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Licensed under CC BY 4.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 !HISTORY 2024-03-04 {LEGO Instructions App} Original part shape
0 !HISTORY 2024-12-22 [ejboer] File preparation for LDraw Parts Tracker
Show contents
1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\5414s01.dat
3 16 -10 5.1963 7.5265 -10 9.1499 -2.4268 10 11.3582 -21.2293
3 16 10 11.3582 -21.2293 -10 9.1499 -2.4268 10 18.6202 -37
4 16 7 20 -37 10 18.6202 -37 -10 9.1499 -2.4268 -10 14.1072 -11.6589
4 16 10 1.2836 19.12 10 0 40 -10 0 40 -10 .5872 28.9266
3 16 10 1.28358 19.12 -10 .5872 28.9266 -10 2.3284 18.0399
3 16 10 1.28358 19.12 -10 2.3284 18.0399 10 5.0895 -1.408
3 16 10 5.0895 -1.408 -10 2.3284 18.0399 -10 5.1963 7.5265
3 16 -4.152 20 -25.848 -3.556 19.65666 -25.958 -10 20 -20
4 16 -10 20 -20 -3.556 19.65666 -25.958 -3.00031 19.4939 -26.28331 -10 14.1072 -11.6589
3 16 4.10858 19.63817 -33.59642 4.17702 19.98302 -34.15298 7 20 -37
3 16 3.77571 19.46703 -33.0213 4.10858 19.63817 -33.59642 7 20 -37
3 16 -10 14.1072 -11.6589 -3.00031 19.4939 -26.28331 3.77571 19.46703 -33.0213
3 16 -10 14.1072 -11.6589 3.77571 19.46703 -33.0213 7 20 -37
3 16 10 5.0895 -1.408 -10 5.1963 7.5265 10 11.3582 -21.232
Status:
Errors Found (HN)
This part has the following automated holds from the Parts Tracker
-
Has uncertified subfiles
Current Votes:
| User | Vote |
|---|---|
| MagFors | Hold |
Official parents and subparts
Part Events:
Instead of use:
1 16 0 8 22 -1.5 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 2 rect3.dat
1 16 3.75 6.5 20 -2.25 0 0 0 0 -1.5 0 -1 0 rect3.dat
1 16 -3.75 6.5 20 -2.25 0 0 0 0 -1.5 0 -1 0 rect3.dat
1 16 1.5 6.5 22 0 -1 0 0 0 -1.5 2 0 0 rect2a.dat
1 16 -1.5 6.5 22 0 1 0 -1.5 0 0 0 0 2 rect1.dat
1 16 0 6.5 24 -1.5 0 0 0 0 -1.5 0 -1 0 rect1.dat
1 16 3.75 5 22 2.25 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 -2 rect1.dat
1 16 -3.75 5 22 -2.25 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 2 rect1.dat
use only:
0 BFC INVERTNEXT
1 16 3.75 6.5 22 0 -2.25 0 -1.5 0 0 0 0 -2 box3-7a.dat
0 BFC INVERTNEXT
1 16 -3.75 6.5 22 0 2.25 0 -1.5 0 0 0 0 -2 box3-7a.dat
1 16 0 6.5 22 1.5 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 2 0 box2-7.dat
1 16 0 8 22 -1.5 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 2 rect3.dat
1 16 3.75 6.5 20 -2.25 0 0 0 0 -1.5 0 -1 0 rect3.dat
1 16 -3.75 6.5 20 -2.25 0 0 0 0 -1.5 0 -1 0 rect3.dat
1 16 1.5 6.5 22 0 -1 0 0 0 -1.5 2 0 0 rect2a.dat
1 16 -1.5 6.5 22 0 1 0 -1.5 0 0 0 0 2 rect1.dat
1 16 0 6.5 24 -1.5 0 0 0 0 -1.5 0 -1 0 rect1.dat
1 16 3.75 5 22 2.25 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 -2 rect1.dat
1 16 -3.75 5 22 -2.25 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 2 rect1.dat
use only:
0 BFC INVERTNEXT
1 16 3.75 6.5 22 0 -2.25 0 -1.5 0 0 0 0 -2 box3-7a.dat
0 BFC INVERTNEXT
1 16 -3.75 6.5 22 0 2.25 0 -1.5 0 0 0 0 -2 box3-7a.dat
1 16 0 6.5 22 1.5 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 2 0 box2-7.dat
adjusted as proposed
used box2-5 instead
2024-12-22 17:54:12
could use box prim for the center underside stud holder...
2024-12-22 18:09:24
You should probably subfile to prepare for printed patterns
subparted for patterns, changed box prims again (uploaded before save...)
2024-12-24 12:49:32
2024-12-24 13:57:48
2024-12-24 14:12:28
why the center vertexes?
Modified left curve, want to work on front as well, i think it needs to be lowered, there is room for that
2024-12-24 15:42:21
center vertices can maybe be reduced as well without loosing the curve, will check for that after the holidays
small fix
Quick intermediate release, used the curve of 24309 as a reference, tweaked the front a bit, but still want to try to get the curve smoother
2024-12-27 10:59:17
the front to the cutout is curled inside instead of curved outside, strange...
that one front vertex should get moved down.
that one front vertex should get moved down.
updated with suggestions (not including the prims yet)
2025-01-03 12:33:23
2025-01-03 16:04:27
better (but the front still looks like it is inward curled...)
Raised the center front a bit (0.25 LDU) and took a different angle for the front curve on the top. Still difficult to get it perfect while preserving the curves with adjacent pieces
All surfaces need to meet this surface to be correct.
2 12 -10 20 -20 7 20 -37
2 11 7 20 -37 10 20 -40
3 10 -10 14.1072 -11.6589 -10 20 -20 10 20 -40
3 10 10 20 -40 10 11.3582 -21.232 -10 9.1499 -2.4268
3 10 -10 9.1499 -2.4268 -10 14.1072 -11.6589 10 20 -40
You need to lift the cutout.
IMHO this is not a Wedge. It's a "Slope Brick Curved ... " like the other similar parts in this family.
2 12 -10 20 -20 7 20 -37
2 11 7 20 -37 10 20 -40
3 10 -10 14.1072 -11.6589 -10 20 -20 10 20 -40
3 10 10 20 -40 10 11.3582 -21.232 -10 9.1499 -2.4268
3 10 -10 9.1499 -2.4268 -10 14.1072 -11.6589 10 20 -40
You need to lift the cutout.
IMHO this is not a Wedge. It's a "Slope Brick Curved ... " like the other similar parts in this family.
2025-01-04 20:44:53
this is a wedge, not a brick curved, because curved bricks are normally curved around only 1 axis...
wedges are odd shaped or with sideways slopes (like this one)
wedges are odd shaped or with sideways slopes (like this one)
2025-01-05 09:42:16
I see all these as part of the same familly and they shoud be sorted together.
5093, Slope Curved 2 x 2 x 0.667 with Stud Notch Right
5095, Slope Curved 2 x 2 x 0.667 with Stud Notch Left
80177, Slope Brick Curved 3 x 2 with Cutout Left
80178, Slope Brick Curved 3 x 2 with Cutout Right
11477, Slope Brick Curved 2 x 1
50950, Slope Brick Curved 3 x 1
61678, Slope Brick Curved 4 x 1
29119, Slope Brick Curved 2 x 1 with Cutout Right
29120, Slope Brick Curved 2 x 1 with Cutout Left
66956, Slope Brick Curved 2 x 2 with Double Cutout
5093, Slope Curved 2 x 2 x 0.667 with Stud Notch Right
5095, Slope Curved 2 x 2 x 0.667 with Stud Notch Left
80177, Slope Brick Curved 3 x 2 with Cutout Left
80178, Slope Brick Curved 3 x 2 with Cutout Right
11477, Slope Brick Curved 2 x 1
50950, Slope Brick Curved 3 x 1
61678, Slope Brick Curved 4 x 1
29119, Slope Brick Curved 2 x 1 with Cutout Right
29120, Slope Brick Curved 2 x 1 with Cutout Left
66956, Slope Brick Curved 2 x 2 with Double Cutout
2025-01-05 09:47:24
1 0 90 -32 20 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 80178.dat
1 14 120 -32 20 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 50950.dat
1 2 140 -32 10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5414.dat
1 14 160 -32 10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 61678.dat
1 2 180 -32 10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5415.dat
1 14 200 -32 20 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 50950.dat
1 0 230 -32 20 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 80177.dat
1 14 120 -32 20 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 50950.dat
1 2 140 -32 10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5414.dat
1 14 160 -32 10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 61678.dat
1 2 180 -32 10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5415.dat
1 14 200 -32 20 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 50950.dat
1 0 230 -32 20 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 80177.dat
2025-01-05 09:47:41
1 0 -20 -8 -60 0 0 -1 0 1 0 1 0 0 5093.dat
1 2 -20 -8 -30 0 0 -1 0 1 0 1 0 0 11477.dat
1 0 -20 -8 -10 0 0 -1 0 1 0 1 0 0 29120.dat
1 0 0 -8 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 66956.dat
1 0 20 -8 -10 0 0 1 0 1 0 -1 0 0 29119.dat
1 14 20 -8 -40 0 0 1 0 1 0 -1 0 0 5852.dat
1 0 60 -8 -40 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5095.dat
1 2 -20 -8 -30 0 0 -1 0 1 0 1 0 0 11477.dat
1 0 -20 -8 -10 0 0 -1 0 1 0 1 0 0 29120.dat
1 0 0 -8 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 66956.dat
1 0 20 -8 -10 0 0 1 0 1 0 -1 0 0 29119.dat
1 14 20 -8 -40 0 0 1 0 1 0 -1 0 0 5852.dat
1 0 60 -8 -40 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5095.dat
2025-01-05 10:04:47
hm seems to be some differences in naming between the pages (Lego/LDraw/BL/RB)...
2025-01-05 11:57:19
BL says Wedge, RB says Slope Curved
what is the official Lego name?
what is the official Lego name?
2025-01-05 12:17:02
checked NewElementary:
there is the official Lego name: BRICK 1X4X1, HALF BOW W/ CUT, RIGHT
but they call it wedge
there is the official Lego name: BRICK 1X4X1, HALF BOW W/ CUT, RIGHT
but they call it wedge
some changes again to the front, renamed in line with similar parts to curved slope
2025-01-27 16:54:43
2025-01-27 17:00:58
Still think the tip should be convex, but I don't have the part, yet...
2025-02-26 08:49:51
- I think that the short side should match exactly the curve of 50950 (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEho7wU8Bt3cwIE8I0TaLNE-A94yaUEKujMeZ-Gk3nw6020LH3SCp0CBypHNGatq8Ex-MvVELconKBfVKOnx2zZYe4xWLhHyC2hEGDSuWx6r1W6Ax95CuXIU7MOt2g-bB3ZzkrrCH_8lcEU4K2TJxO_9_oumOGobrjMjrMkVOfHN02TKRR27UQSFYC-ymkah/s1800/SC2024-10.jpg)
- Like Magnus I don't like the concave area near tip.
That could be improved by changing triangulation from
3 16 -10 11.3582 -21.232 -3.77571 19.46703 -33.0213 3.00031 19.4939 -26.28331
3 16 -10 11.3582 -21.232 3.00031 19.4939 -26.28331 10 20 -20
3 16 -10 11.3582 -21.232 10 20 -20 10 14.1072 -11.6589
to
3 16 -10 11.3582 -21.232 -3.77571 19.46703 -33.0213 3.00031 19.4939 -26.28331
3 16 3.00031 19.4939 -26.28331 10 20 -20 10 14.1072 -11.6589
3 16 10 14.1072 -11.6589 -10 11.3582 -21.232 3.00031 19.4939 -26.28331
or perhaps even to
3 16 -3.77571 19.46703 -33.0213 3.00031 19.4939 -26.28331 10 14.1072 -11.6589
3 16 3.00031 19.4939 -26.28331 10 20 -20 10 14.1072 -11.6589
3 16 10 14.1072 -11.6589 -10 11.3582 -21.232 -3.77571 19.46703 -33.0213
){kind=link}
- Like Magnus I don't like the concave area near tip.
That could be improved by changing triangulation from
3 16 -10 11.3582 -21.232 -3.77571 19.46703 -33.0213 3.00031 19.4939 -26.28331
3 16 -10 11.3582 -21.232 3.00031 19.4939 -26.28331 10 20 -20
3 16 -10 11.3582 -21.232 10 20 -20 10 14.1072 -11.6589
to
3 16 -10 11.3582 -21.232 -3.77571 19.46703 -33.0213 3.00031 19.4939 -26.28331
3 16 3.00031 19.4939 -26.28331 10 20 -20 10 14.1072 -11.6589
3 16 10 14.1072 -11.6589 -10 11.3582 -21.232 3.00031 19.4939 -26.28331
or perhaps even to
3 16 -3.77571 19.46703 -33.0213 3.00031 19.4939 -26.28331 10 14.1072 -11.6589
3 16 3.00031 19.4939 -26.28331 10 20 -20 10 14.1072 -11.6589
3 16 10 14.1072 -11.6589 -10 11.3582 -21.232 -3.77571 19.46703 -33.0213
2025-02-26 11:10:04
the problem with 50950 is that its curve isnt good...
the 3x2 curved slope (24309) is better and used for this one.
61678 and 24309 (when inlined) give these cyli surfaces:
1 14 -30 68.2828 40 0 20 0 -68.2828 0 0 0 0 -84.8536 48\1-8cyli.dat
1 14 30 149.253 40 0 -20 0 -149.253 0 0 0 0 -160 48\1-8cyli.dat
if you now draw triangles to connect these two, you get this:
3 4 -10 5.1963 7.5265 -10 9.15 -2.4268 10 11.3582 -21.232
3 4 10 11.3582 -21.232 -10 9.15 -2.4268 10 20 -40
3 4 -10 9.15 -2.4268 -10 14.1072 -11.6589 10 20 -40
3 4 10 20 -40 -10 14.1072 -11.6589 10 30.8357 -57.408
3 4 10 30.8357 -57.408 -10 14.1072 -11.6589 -10 20 -20
3 4 10 30.8357 -57.408 -10 20 -20 10 43.7162 -73.136
the final surface should be cut out from these.
should the stud cutout be made of prims (in the subfile)?
the 3x2 curved slope (24309) is better and used for this one.
61678 and 24309 (when inlined) give these cyli surfaces:
1 14 -30 68.2828 40 0 20 0 -68.2828 0 0 0 0 -84.8536 48\1-8cyli.dat
1 14 30 149.253 40 0 -20 0 -149.253 0 0 0 0 -160 48\1-8cyli.dat
if you now draw triangles to connect these two, you get this:
3 4 -10 5.1963 7.5265 -10 9.15 -2.4268 10 11.3582 -21.232
3 4 10 11.3582 -21.232 -10 9.15 -2.4268 10 20 -40
3 4 -10 9.15 -2.4268 -10 14.1072 -11.6589 10 20 -40
3 4 10 20 -40 -10 14.1072 -11.6589 10 30.8357 -57.408
3 4 10 30.8357 -57.408 -10 14.1072 -11.6589 -10 20 -20
3 4 10 30.8357 -57.408 -10 20 -20 10 43.7162 -73.136
the final surface should be cut out from these.
should the stud cutout be made of prims (in the subfile)?
The top surface is not concave. It's all one twisted, convex surface
2025-03-09 16:06:22
think the stud cutout at the front should have the chamfers/rounding removed and make it angular
2025-04-25 00:22:07
should use this at the front (with cutout)
3 16 -10 5.1963 7.5265 -10 9.1499 -2.4268 10 11.3582 -21.2293
3 16 10 11.3582 -21.2293 -10 9.1499 -2.4268 10 18.6202 -37
4 16 7 20 -37 10 18.6202 -37 -10 9.1499 -2.4268 -10 14.1072 -11.6589
3 16 -10 14.1072 -11.6589 -10 20 -20 7 20 -37
3 16 -10 5.1963 7.5265 -10 9.1499 -2.4268 10 11.3582 -21.2293
3 16 10 11.3582 -21.2293 -10 9.1499 -2.4268 10 18.6202 -37
4 16 7 20 -37 10 18.6202 -37 -10 9.1499 -2.4268 -10 14.1072 -11.6589
3 16 -10 14.1072 -11.6589 -10 20 -20 7 20 -37
Changed surface
2025-05-12 10:12:48
Seams to be missing some condlines.
Missing condlines.
Creative Commons Attribution License information
This part is copyright © Evert-Jan Boer
Licensed under CC BY 4.0
Edits:
LDraw.org Parts Tracker,
3D View
Website copyright ©2003-2025 LDraw.org, see Legal Info for details.
LDraw is a completely unofficial, community run free CAD system which represents official parts produced by the LEGO company.
LDraw™ is a trademark owned and licensed by the Estate of James Jessiman
LEGO® is a registered trademark of the LEGO Group, which does not sponsor,
endorse, or authorize this site. Visit the official Lego website at
http://www.lego.com
Tricky to get the curve at the tip right, maybe some adjustments needed