Unofficial File parts/11854p01.dat
Part Attributes:
Base Part: 11854.dat
File Header:
0 Duplo Candle with Yellow Flame
0 Name: 11854p01.dat
0 Author: Peter Blomberg [WUIt]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Licensed under CC BY 4.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 !KEYWORDS BrickLink 98219c01, Colour Combination, Rebrickable 11854pr0001
0 !KEYWORDS Set 10433, Set 10597, Set 10850, Set 10862, Set 10958, Set 10977
0 !KEYWORDS Set 30330, Set 45004, Set 45013, Set 6785
Show contents
1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\11854s02.dat
1 14 0 -114 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\11854s01.dat
Status:
Needs 2 More Votes (N)
This part has the following automated holds from the Parts Tracker
-
Has uncertified subfiles
Current Votes:
None
Official parents and subparts
Part Events:
2025-10-02 15:01:00
Fixed subfile paths
Header Edits
help:
0 !HELP
to
0 !HELP
history:
0 !HISTORY 2025-09-24 [Evilspyre] Scanned the part
0 !HISTORY 2025-10-02 [WUIt] File preparation for LDraw Parts Tracker
to
I think the "scanned" history only need to be on the "base" part
2025-10-18 18:52:32
Does the description of this part need to end with "Pattern"?
2025-10-18 18:55:48
This is dual-mold, isn't it?
We already have some assemblies (like 73355p02.dat) using pattern in the name, so I guess yes.
We already have some assemblies (like 73355p02.dat) using pattern in the name, so I guess yes.
2025-10-18 18:58:10
Hmm, Lego claims this is a print, it seems.
2025-10-18 19:06:09
is 11854 (older version, 2010-2013) printed and the newer version 34099/106130 dual-molded?
I found photos of the older one with paint wear. The newer versions dropped the "Dec." suffix in Lego's name.
I found photos of the older one with paint wear. The newer versions dropped the "Dec." suffix in Lego's name.
2025-10-18 19:45:40
This is a dual-mold part. Don't know about earlier versions.
2025-10-18 21:28:00
Do we have both? Do we need both?
Does it make a difference for the description?
If we differentiate both versions (not sure if there are more differences than just the paint), then this should be 34099, not 11854.
Does it make a difference for the description?
If we differentiate both versions (not sure if there are more differences than just the paint), then this should be 34099, not 11854.
Creative Commons Attribution License information
This part is copyright © Peter Blomberg
Licensed under CC BY 4.0
Edits:
LDraw.org Parts Tracker,