Unofficial File parts/11854p01.dat
Warning: Model breaking changes to unofficial parts may occur anytime prior to release
0 Duplo Candle with Yellow Flame
0 Name: 11854p01.dat
0 Author: Peter Blomberg [WUIt]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Licensed under CC BY 4.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 !CATEGORY Duplo
0 !KEYWORDS BrickLink 98219c01, Colour Combination, Rebrickable 11854pr0001
0 !KEYWORDS Set 10433, Set 10597, Set 10850, Set 10862, Set 10958, Set 10977
0 !KEYWORDS Set 30330, Set 45004, Set 45013, Set 6785Show file code:
1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\11854s02.dat
1 14 0 -114 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\11854s01.datStatus
Needs 2 More Votes (N)
Current Votes:
No recorded votesThis part has the following automated holds from the Parts Tracker
-
Has Uncertified Subfiles
Part Dependencies
Official parents and subparts
Part Events
Peter Blomberg [WUIt]
initially submitted the part.
2025-10-02 15:01:00
Peter Blomberg [WUIt]
submitted a new version of the part (all votes reset).
2025-10-02 15:01:54
Fixed subfile paths
Orion Pobursky [OrionP]
edited the part header.
2025-10-02 20:31:15
Header Edits
help:
0 !HELP
to
0 !HELP
history:
0 !HISTORY 2025-09-24 [Evilspyre] Scanned the part
0 !HISTORY 2025-10-02 [WUIt] File preparation for LDraw Parts Tracker
to
I think the "scanned" history only need to be on the "base" part
Peter Blomberg [WUIt]
made the following comment.
2025-10-18 18:52:32
Does the description of this part need to end with "Pattern"?
Chris Böhnke [KnightOfTarenta]
made the following comment.
2025-10-18 18:55:48
This is dual-mold, isn't it?
We already have some assemblies (like 73355p02.dat) using pattern in the name, so I guess yes.
We already have some assemblies (like 73355p02.dat) using pattern in the name, so I guess yes.
Chris Böhnke [KnightOfTarenta]
made the following comment.
2025-10-18 18:58:10
Hmm, Lego claims this is a print, it seems.
Chris Böhnke [KnightOfTarenta]
made the following comment.
2025-10-18 19:06:09
is 11854 (older version, 2010-2013) printed and the newer version 34099/106130 dual-molded?
I found photos of the older one with paint wear. The newer versions dropped the "Dec." suffix in Lego's name.
I found photos of the older one with paint wear. The newer versions dropped the "Dec." suffix in Lego's name.
Peter Blomberg [WUIt]
made the following comment.
2025-10-18 19:45:40
This is a dual-mold part. Don't know about earlier versions.
Chris Böhnke [KnightOfTarenta]
made the following comment.
2025-10-18 21:28:00
Do we have both? Do we need both?
Does it make a difference for the description?
If we differentiate both versions (not sure if there are more differences than just the paint), then this should be 34099, not 11854.
Does it make a difference for the description?
If we differentiate both versions (not sure if there are more differences than just the paint), then this should be 34099, not 11854.