Unofficial File parts/103479.dat
Warning: Model breaking changes to unofficial parts may occur anytime prior to release
Electric Powered Up Hub with  3 Integrated Motors and  6 Lights
0 Electric Powered Up Hub with  3 Integrated Motors and  6 Lights
0 Name: 103479.dat
0 Author: Philippe Hurbain [Philo]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Shortcut
0 !LICENSE Licensed under CC BY 4.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !CATEGORY Electric
0 !KEYWORDS BrickLink 103479c01, Rebrickable 103479c01
Show file code:
1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 u9586c01.dat
1 2 0 -30 110 -1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 -1 4109.dat
1 4 -40 0 160 -1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 -1 4194.dat
1 4 40 0 160 -1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 -1 4194.dat
1 4 0 0 -160 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 4194.dat
1 4 -69 0 130 0 0 1 0 1 0 -1 0 0 4194.dat
1 4 69 0 130 0 0 -1 0 1 0 1 0 0 4194.dat

Status

Part Dependencies

Official parents and subparts

Part Events

Philippe Hurbain [Philo]
Senior Part Reviewer
initially submitted the part.
2024-10-17 12:26:55
Work in progress!
Philippe Hurbain [Philo]
Senior Part Reviewer
submitted a new version of the part (all votes reset).
2024-10-19 09:54:13
Philippe Hurbain [Philo]
Senior Part Reviewer
submitted a new version of the part (all votes reset).
2024-10-25 09:04:48
Philippe Hurbain [Philo]
Senior Part Reviewer
renamed the part.
2024-10-25 12:06:40
"parts/1036224.dat" to "parts/103479.dat"
Philippe Hurbain [Philo]
Senior Part Reviewer
made the following comment.
2024-10-25 12:08:25
Renamed to Rebrickable/BL part number. the 7 digits part number (from BIs) was probably wrong.
Rene Rechthaler [Blechtaler]
Part Header Editor
made the following comment.
2025-08-21 12:21:32
there is now an updated one where the battery can be fixated with pins, name still correct or do we need to differentiate?
Philippe Hurbain [Philo]
Senior Part Reviewer
made the following comment.
2025-08-21 12:32:26
I think it's still fine, the new one will get a qualifier such as "with battery lock"
Rene Rechthaler [Blechtaler]
Part Header Editor
made the following comment.
2025-08-21 12:33:42
any subparts who need new subfiles (for common areas)?
Philippe Hurbain [Philo]
Senior Part Reviewer
made the following comment.
2025-08-21 14:06:39
Probably yes, but I won't work on the new version now...