Unofficial File parts/70694c01.dat
Part Attributes:
Base Part: 70694.dat
File Header:
0 Technic Competition Arrow with Solid Shaft and Trans Orange Liquid Shaped Tip
0 Name: 70694c01.dat
0 Author: Peter Grass [Evilspyre]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Licensed under CC BY 4.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 !KEYWORDS BrickLink 70694pb01, Set 71411-1
Show contents
1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\70694s01.dat
1 16 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\70694s01.dat
1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\70694s02.dat
1 16 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 s\70694s02.dat
1 57 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\70694s03.dat
1 57 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\70694s03.dat
1 57 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 s\70694s03.dat
1 57 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 s\70694s03.dat
Status:
Errors Found (HHHHN)
This part has the following automated holds from the Parts Tracker
-
Has uncertified subfiles
Current Votes:
| User | Vote |
|---|---|
| Philo | Hold |
| MagFors | Hold |
| Blechtaler | Hold |
| KnightOfTarenta | Hold |
Official parents and subparts
Part Events:
2025-06-17 18:22:44
2025-06-17 18:37:14
Ah OK, maybe the front wasn't added in the orginal file as its normally covered up by a solid colour for the rubber end part.
2025-06-17 18:48:39
I will buy the part and take it to bits so there is an accurate view of the front element.
2025-06-17 18:51:00
use pilers to destroy the trans orange bit?
2025-06-17 18:51:31
Yeah, shouldn't be a problem to take it off (hopefully)
2025-06-17 19:01:37
2025-06-18 05:20:47
This should be p01, not c01.
And indeed, a closure subpart should be added for opaque+trans configurations
And indeed, a closure subpart should be added for opaque+trans configurations
2025-06-18 08:25:46
The interior is available in the BI
What escapes my imanignation is the moulding process of the tip (given the BI mesh)
Why isn't the entire tip and the entire shaft a seperate subfile?
What escapes my imanignation is the moulding process of the tip (given the BI mesh)
Why isn't the entire tip and the entire shaft a seperate subfile?
2025-06-18 11:21:35
I grabbed it from BI, the front rubber part will need to be redone too since it has these dimple things on half of it so it can't simply be 4 copied quarters like how it was originally made. I guess it can be 2 sets of mirrored quarters though.
2025-06-18 15:54:22
Are all these dual mould, i.e. trans orange shaft with a trans orange rubber tip?
https://brickset.com/parts/design-70694
orange, "white", green, blue
Are we missing a Rubber_Trans_Orange colour code?
https://brickset.com/parts/design-70694
orange, "white", green, blue
Are we missing a Rubber_Trans_Orange colour code?
2025-06-18 16:00:01
yes along with rubber very light bluish grey, metallic dark grey, dark green, dark purple and pearl gold
2025-06-18 16:12:19
is this a dual mould or an assembly?
the monocolor ones: also an assembly or moulded in one step?
I also would tend to two separate, closed "subparts" who get combined here.
the monocolor ones: also an assembly or moulded in one step?
I also would tend to two separate, closed "subparts" who get combined here.
2025-06-18 16:20:01
assembly me think
2025-06-18 16:40:42
I'm not convince that this is not molded in a similar way as the integral tire parts. Either way, 70694 is the number of the "assembly" so color variation should be pXX
2025-06-18 16:52:45
anyone who has the monocolor ones? inside surfaces visible?
is the top "wigglable" or fixed?
is the top "wigglable" or fixed?
2025-06-18 17:08:27
70694 is printed on the shaft
https://img.bricklink.com/ItemImage/PN/15/70694.png
https://img.bricklink.com/ItemImage/PN/15/70694.png
2025-06-18 17:45:46
I have to agree with Orion, this is for sure dual molded as otherwise the rubber part would not be possible to do , let alone the later assembly
The inside is clearly visible and the tip is NOT rubber, but solid hard plastic (MABS likely).
Inside structure is missing, thus hold. Also this has literally nothing to do with Competition/Cyber Slam.
Inside structure is missing, thus hold. Also this has literally nothing to do with Competition/Cyber Slam.
2025-06-18 23:06:32
Some further details regarding the raised questions (unless I misunderstood you):
*this is clearly dual moulded, with a thin mould line running along the tip part
*base is either ABS or MABS as well (since the transparent one has to be MABS, I tend towards the later)
*the tip's "fluid" contour is symmetrical from directions (but horizontal and vertical differ)
*70694 + (c)2019 on shaft
*this is clearly dual moulded, with a thin mould line running along the tip part
*base is either ABS or MABS as well (since the transparent one has to be MABS, I tend towards the later)
*the tip's "fluid" contour is symmetrical from directions (but horizontal and vertical differ)
*70694 + (c)2019 on shaft
2025-06-18 23:07:16
Missing a "both" on 3rd point...
2025-06-19 16:42:30
Could someone explain what they mean with "multicombination"?
To me, it meens a dual injection of different colours or material.
https://brickset.com/parts/design-70694
How do we make a part with a dual injection of the same colour?
To me, it meens a dual injection of different colours or material.
https://brickset.com/parts/design-70694
How do we make a part with a dual injection of the same colour?
2025-06-19 16:48:47
normally a dual moulded part wont have its bi mesh have modelled internal structure
2025-06-19 18:37:27
@Magnnus:
Interesting case...
The way I would explain this, "Multicombination" is nowadays always assigned if a part design is labelled as such?
Since this mold seemingly only works that way, it's dual moulded 42/42 (42 Tr.L.Blue) and TLG doesn't see an issue with that? It's weird though, that there's only one version with an actual colour difference and it wasn't the first introduced...
On the other hand, I could simply be wrong about the shaft being MABS... If it's something else, than things should work the usual way with "Multicombination". Though hard to tell what that second material would be, since it has to be a transparent material, unlike rubber or PP.
Interesting case...
The way I would explain this, "Multicombination" is nowadays always assigned if a part design is labelled as such?
Since this mold seemingly only works that way, it's dual moulded 42/42 (42 Tr.L.Blue) and TLG doesn't see an issue with that? It's weird though, that there's only one version with an actual colour difference and it wasn't the first introduced...
On the other hand, I could simply be wrong about the shaft being MABS... If it's something else, than things should work the usual way with "Multicombination". Though hard to tell what that second material would be, since it has to be a transparent material, unlike rubber or PP.
2025-06-20 12:07:09
I got the proper part through in the post, and the tip feels like regular hard plastic in this instance, so its not made of rubber or anything. Totally doesn't have any give to it, and its not even remotely removable. So I guess its just dual moulded, one for the bight light orange and one for the trans orange end.
2025-06-20 12:36:21
maybe try pulling it really hard with pilers
2025-06-20 14:43:25
Its literally moulded to the other part so no way to remove it. No need to remove it now since the raw part is in BI anyway.
2025-06-20 15:11:26
full raw part? both subparts complete?
2025-06-20 15:32:34
It has both raw parts, I chopped the head part into half since its repeated, the shaft part can't be chopped in half since one half has a groove on the top half that the other half doesn't have. I am not entirely sure how to properly clean it up so I will leave that to the person who made the original part to do.
2025-06-20 17:25:48
Yes il do, but my LDraw time is somewhat limited these days 😉
Please update to use the new subparts...
2025-06-27 10:11:36
bump
2025-06-27 10:14:09
Messed up colours. Caused by new sub-parts?
2025-06-27 10:22:38
i think so
2025-06-27 11:41:41
Yes. I refactored/renamed the subparts, that's the reason.
Peter, could you please update the content.
I want to renumber this to 70694p01
I want to renumber this to 70694p01
Creative Commons Attribution License information
This part is copyright © Peter Grass
Licensed under CC BY 4.0
Edits:
LDraw.org Parts Tracker,
3D View
Website copyright ©2003-2025 LDraw.org, see Legal Info for details.
LDraw is a completely unofficial, community run free CAD system which represents official parts produced by the LEGO company.
LDraw™ is a trademark owned and licensed by the Estate of James Jessiman
LEGO® is a registered trademark of the LEGO Group, which does not sponsor,
endorse, or authorize this site. Visit the official Lego website at
http://www.lego.com
you can look into the solid part from the transparent front...